Iraqi Civilian Massacre: how it happened

Discussion in 'Politics' started by CptStern, May 30, 2006.

  1. Lemonking

    Lemonking Newbie

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2004
    Messages:
    2,021
    Likes Received:
    0
    read the article idiot,


    "The investigation of the attack in Ishaqi concluded that the U.S. troops followed normal procedures in raising the level of force after they came under fire while approaching a building where they believed was an Al Qaeda terrorist was hiding, said Maj. Gen. William Caldwell, a U.S military spokesman"


    Fox News,is a totaly difffernt channel trhen FOx9 thats a local channel.
     
  2. Solaris

    Solaris Party Escort Bot

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2005
    Messages:
    10,323
    Likes Received:
    4
    Read the magical porn thread in off topic.
     
  3. 99.vikram

    99.vikram Tank

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2006
    Messages:
    4,324
    Likes Received:
    1
    US, please stop! Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq, and now Iran. Isn't there enough trouble already?
     
  4. Lemonking

    Lemonking Newbie

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2004
    Messages:
    2,021
    Likes Received:
    0


    oh ok lets just press this button and it will stop :|
    get a grip.
     
  5. mortiz

    mortiz Newbie

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2003
    Messages:
    4,074
    Likes Received:
    0
    I fail to see what the article you posted proves? Other than the military is trying to cover their own asses. I haven't heard anything regarding weapons on the scene, why would the U.S. military take all of the weapons away and then leave the scene? Surely if the militaries chain of events did take place they should have secured the area and waited for backup to arrive? But they simply left, with no evidence to back-up their claims. So we have the words of the Iraqi civilians vs the words the soldiers who were there. Who would you rather believe? So the military is saying that their own boys didn't purposefully kill some civilians which could have a massive effect on the popularity(if there's any left) of this war? Wow, sorry if it doesn't inspire me with confidence. Try an independent investigation first.
     
  6. DreadLord

    DreadLord Guest

    Post of the year.
     
  7. ^Ben

    ^Ben Newbie

    Joined:
    May 27, 2004
    Messages:
    2,744
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hatithda(sp) had two cover ups before the truth started to come out, would not suprise me if this was another.
     
  8. gh0st

    gh0st Newbie

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2003
    Messages:
    6,023
    Likes Received:
    0
    if true they should be punished as they did to their victims.

    however i stress that typically people are innocent until proven guilty. i'll wait until the facts are sorted. though i do find it laughable that everyone assumes the soldiers are guilty by virtue of the fact that they are american troops.
     
  9. CptStern

    CptStern suckmonkey

    Joined:
    May 5, 2004
    Messages:
    10,321
    Likes Received:
    46
    nah, it's just your collective persecution complex

    - eyewitness accounts makes it incredibly hard to deny their guilt
    - they tried to cover it up twice
    - your own government's initial report says there's strong evidence that they did indeed murder them in cold blood
    - babies/young children were shot at point blank range in the chest/head ...I'd like to see you explain that away ..perhaps they were armed and the marines feared for their lives
     
  10. _Z_Ryuken

    _Z_Ryuken Newbie

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2005
    Messages:
    3,835
    Likes Received:
    0
    Sticking with my initial thought.
    Super racism/ mini genocide.
     
  11. gh0st

    gh0st Newbie

    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2003
    Messages:
    6,023
    Likes Received:
    0
    i wasnt there... you werent either. so i cant explain anything, and neither can you. i simply choose to place my trust in the most trust worthy government in the world instead of a bunch of mud-hut dwelling terrorists.
     
  12. _Z_Ryuken

    _Z_Ryuken Newbie

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2005
    Messages:
    3,835
    Likes Received:
    0
    Wait wait wait.

    Which government is the most trustworthy government in the world again?

    And are you saying this news came from mud-hut dwelling terrorists?
     
  13. Lemonking

    Lemonking Newbie

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2004
    Messages:
    2,021
    Likes Received:
    0
    wroong thhhhhreeeaddd
     
  14. _Z_Ryuken

    _Z_Ryuken Newbie

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2005
    Messages:
    3,835
    Likes Received:
    0
    Are you looking for the Canada terrorists thread?
     
  15. gick

    gick Newbie

    Joined:
    May 9, 2005
    Messages:
    2,104
    Likes Received:
    0
    j/k right?
     
  16. Lemonking

    Lemonking Newbie

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2004
    Messages:
    2,021
    Likes Received:
    0


    shit ::frown:



    my bad :p
     
  17. Sulkdodds

    Sulkdodds Companion Cube

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2003
    Messages:
    18,853
    Likes Received:
    19
    I thought people were assuming they were guilty because:

    - they were human
    - this has happened before throughout history
    - all the evidence points to them being guilty

    As opposed to 'THEY WERE AMERICANS = MURDERERS'
     
  18. CptStern

    CptStern suckmonkey

    Joined:
    May 5, 2004
    Messages:
    10,321
    Likes Received:
    46
    no, but I can look at the available evidence, which is based on first hand accounts from eyewitnesses and soldiers called in to mop up



    lol! ya, truly trust worthy, what the hell was I thinking?



    they must be getting pretty desperate if they have to resort to conscripting babies

    Perhaps the US marine who gunned down everyone in the room believed Asia was a threat
     
  19. K e r b e r o s

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2003
    Messages:
    3,233
    Likes Received:
    0
    The Insurgents have had just as worse massacres, and many that have occured before this one. I find it interesting nobody makes a big deal about those, so now I will.

    http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200605/s1652284.htm < - 30-40 bodies, Iraqi Policemen, Children, several animals, shot or tortured to death
    http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,1433722,00.html < - Around 30-60 bodies found in Iraq, signs of torture before execution
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/03/14/AR2006031400273.html < - Around 40 executed, several beheaded
    http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/meast/05/16/iraq.main/ < - 55 Executed by Al-Qaeda
     
  20. CptStern

    CptStern suckmonkey

    Joined:
    May 5, 2004
    Messages:
    10,321
    Likes Received:
    46
    so how does that excuse what the US marines did? or will you just ignore these atrocites because "the insurgents do it too"
     
  21. gick

    gick Newbie

    Joined:
    May 9, 2005
    Messages:
    2,104
    Likes Received:
    0
    Also, as tragic as the examples you posted are, its to be expected from psychos like AlQuada, whereas the US soldiers are supposed to be there to prevent this sort of thing from happening again. I mean WTF?
     
  22. K e r b e r o s

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2003
    Messages:
    3,233
    Likes Received:
    0
    To CptStern:
    So let me get this straight. You're assuming, [ and nothing more ], that the reason I cited massacres commited by Al-Qaeda in Iraq was to excuse another massacre commited by Coalition Forces around Haditha, as the topic was about.

    Am I right?

    Let me argue this CptStern. Maybe I was'nt. Suppose I was angry at the very idea you could go along and blast almost specifically, US mistakes, massacres, and mishaps throughout the war in Iraq, trumping on the woes of atrocities and unjustified wars without second also thinking about the many hundreds to thousands executed by the Insurgents.
     
  23. K e r b e r o s

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2003
    Messages:
    3,233
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hey, I'm just as upset as you are Gick. Make no mistake about that. But also please, consider the 100,000 US/Coalition Soldiers out there that were'nt involved in this atrocity, and try they're hardest to prevent them.

    The article however, is the focus of the Haditha massacre, and to respect what happened I will only say that I too share your disgust.
     
  24. Yuri

    Yuri Tank

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2004
    Messages:
    5,365
    Likes Received:
    2
    ...when did he say it was an excuse, Stern?

    Oh right: He didn't.
     
  25. CptStern

    CptStern suckmonkey

    Joined:
    May 5, 2004
    Messages:
    10,321
    Likes Received:
    46
    dont asume as you have no idea who I am or what I think

    the US is bound by international law, US law, geneva conventions, they broke those laws when they unilaterally decided to invade a nation under false and fabricated justifications, they marched into iraq under the banner of humanitarianism yet they dont exactly live up to it now do they?


    again, will you ignore those iraqi children who didnt have a chance to politicise anything because they were truely innocent? ..will you ignore their deaths just to placate whatever partisan political ideology you adhere to? Or do the deaths only matter when they support your POV?


    it's implied ..this is his first post in this thread, instead of commenting on the topic at hand he posted examples of how the insurgency targets civlians ..He IS excusing their actions by saying that it's not without precedent on the other side ..as if the killing of civilians by insurgents makes it alright for the opposing forces to do the same
     
  26. Mr-Fusion

    Mr-Fusion Tank

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2003
    Messages:
    5,518
    Likes Received:
    1
    Sewing the seeds, sewing the seeds. Steadily sewing the seeds.

    "Why do they hate us!! I don't understand! September 11 was unjustified! We'd never do that to them! We're not that primitive and mindless!"

    Sewing the seeds
     
  27. Yuri

    Yuri Tank

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2004
    Messages:
    5,365
    Likes Received:
    2
    When is he ignoring ANYTHING, stern?

    He only stated that sometimes it is breezed over that the insurgents also commit atrocities. Never once did he ignore that the US commits them, too. Is every post in this thread supposed to say "The US is horrible" under it?

    Come on, man.
     
  28. CptStern

    CptStern suckmonkey

    Joined:
    May 5, 2004
    Messages:
    10,321
    Likes Received:
    46

    please ..if I had done the same I'm sure someone would have accused me of ignoring insurgent caused deaths

    this tactic is often used by kerberos ..he doesnt post on topic in these sort of threads, he posts links to articles that shows deaths commited by the other side ..which doesnt say not a single iota of how he feels on the particular issue except for the fact that by comparing it he is in fact justifying their actions
     
  29. K e r b e r o s

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2003
    Messages:
    3,233
    Likes Received:
    0
    CptStern, I can tell your a good man. You care for people an entire way accross the globe, in a continent most Americans won't be bothered to travel to, in a country most Americans can't find on a world map, and that to me friend, speaks volumes.

    We just want you to also notice that they're victims out there alongside the ones at Haditha who had different stories, lives, and killers ... and that should also not be forgotten.

    Thats all.
     
  30. Yuri

    Yuri Tank

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2004
    Messages:
    5,365
    Likes Received:
    2
    ...that doesn't matter. The fact remains that he didn't make the connection.

    If anyone else made the same post, I would have attributed it to them commenting on how war is hell. Justifying the actions of these murderous US soldiers would never have crossed my mind.


    Stern, you seriously are a great debater and very knowledgable about all this stuff. But you have one major huge weakness, and that is personal vendetta. It doesn't seem to matter what your enemies post, if it says "Kerberos" or "gh0st," the post is immediately a lie filled with racism and extremist nationalism. It really detracts from your argument.
     
  31. Gray Fox

    Gray Fox Newbie

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2004
    Messages:
    6,570
    Likes Received:
    0
    Would you also consider the many other insurgent that only target foreign hostile occupators in their country, like jubba? I didn't think so.
     
  32. Yuri

    Yuri Tank

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2004
    Messages:
    5,365
    Likes Received:
    2
    Why wouldn't he?

    I would...

    There is too much ridiculous assuming going on.
     
  33. Sulkdodds

    Sulkdodds Companion Cube

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2003
    Messages:
    18,853
    Likes Received:
    19
    I've never heard them mention them.

    Look, Kerberos, what the hell was the point of posting that if not to at least partially attempt to excuse the actions of these marines? It's not at all relevant if 'the other side' (yeah, because there's only two) commits massacres. They are the evil bastard crazy nutso terrorist bastards. The US are supposed to be the friendly humanitarian liberator.

    "This should not be forgotten." What are you talking about? People do make a big deal about insurgent massacres - you do, for a start. The only person who attempts to marginalise the part of the insurgents in atrocities is Solaris, no matter how much he denies it.

    So why post it at all? Because you wanted to draw attention to the fact that the insurgency are bastards as well? That's the same damn thing - 'look, the enemies are evil too. You're just picking on the Americans'.

    Well, no shit Sherlock - the US are supposedly there to end a brutal and human-rights abusing regime. They are supposedly there to stop horrible things from happening. They are supposedly there to save the people of Iraq. This is not liberating or saving anybody. You accuse Stern of consistently focusing on solely American atrocities - but guess what? They're the ones that should be being criticised! The terrorists are terrorists. They're maniacs. This is what they do. The US are a supposedly moral government with scruples.

    And no, this doesn't represent all the soldiers. But it does represent a failure of the US army to actually impress upon its soldiers any sense of ethical conduct. The US army are responsible - responsible for every man and woman they employ. That's their whole central tenet. What with the veritable cornucopia of reports of brutality coming out of Iraq, it is quite hard to see such things as entirely isolated incidents. Shit is happening over there; the sheer volume of stories coming out of the region speaks volumes.

    So what was the point of posting that?
    There was no point, other than to state: "hey, stop picking on the Americans. Look, the insurgents do it to!" There is no other possible purpose, niether is there any other possible effect. You want to start a thread condeming insurgents? Good luck, but I don't think you'll find many who'll argue against you - whatever you might think, it seems generally taken for granted that they're 'bad people'.
     
  34. Laivasse

    Laivasse Companion Cube

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2005
    Messages:
    4,813
    Likes Received:
    27
    ^^^Everything I wanted to say. Using this thread to point out examples of atrocities committed by insurgents is comparable to, for example, linking to a story about a policeman getting shot in the middle of a debate about the Jean Charles De Menezes shooting.
     
  35. CptStern

    CptStern suckmonkey

    Joined:
    May 5, 2004
    Messages:
    10,321
    Likes Received:
    46

    I agree

    I agree .."if anyone else made the same post"


    that's not entirely true ..I really do try to be civil but more often than not other member's similiar POV are ignored in favour of attacking mine ...so you really cant fault me for being a little defensive and maybe even a little annoyed at having to constantly trade volleys into what amounts to little more than nit picking my points to death in the hopes of masking the real issue at hand

    and I dont think I'm all that great a debater ..my grammar is atrocious, spelling mistakes, run on sentences, half-formulated statements and hopelessly obscure terminology that sometimes detracts from what my message is ...it also feeds the trolls as I tend to be verbose in a vain attempt at getting my point across
     
  36. Yuri

    Yuri Tank

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2004
    Messages:
    5,365
    Likes Received:
    2
    Eh, who cares, as long as its legible.

    I dunno, it just makes you seem more fair if you give enemies the benefit of the doubt. No matter who the poster is, I try to picture them as somebody I don't know. That way I won't jump on people I don't like, nor will I just agree with people I like. But whatev, that's just me.

    I don't really agree, though, Sulkdodds. There was so much anti-American shit in this thread, I think it deserved something to compare itself to to some extent. Just to show that both sides commit atrocities...
     
  37. Sulkdodds

    Sulkdodds Companion Cube

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2003
    Messages:
    18,853
    Likes Received:
    19
    I think it was balanced out pretty well, Yuri. I mean, Ludah was arguing strongly for individual soldiers and in general I percieved this thread as more 'anti random-c*nts-killing-civilians' rather 'anti-american'.

    Besides, it's not like a thread being 'anti-american' is actually any detriment to it. If people are anti-american there's generally a reason. You often see people shout 'yeah well YOU HATE AMERICA' like that's any kind of blot on their argument. Well, sorry, it's not. If your view is that America as a whole and its behaviour has been consistently detrimental to the state of the world and if you're backing that up with argument then yes, you are anti-american, and that's perfectly valid.

    It's about right that this thread is 'anti-american'. I would expect any discussion about any group of soldiers who are the responsibility of any army which could be said to represent any country would be full of strong feelings against the country in question.
     
  38. Yuri

    Yuri Tank

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2004
    Messages:
    5,365
    Likes Received:
    2
    It's not valid to use this as proof of your anti-American attitude, though.
     
  39. Zeus

    Zeus Tank

    Joined:
    May 25, 2003
    Messages:
    3,348
    Likes Received:
    0
    Lol...did you miss the keyword there. He said most. So you think MOST U.S. troops are there to shoot up innocent villagers...ok. That explains a lot.
     
  40. Sulkdodds

    Sulkdodds Companion Cube

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2003
    Messages:
    18,853
    Likes Received:
    19
    Well, not alone, no. But if you hate America anyway you probably have a more substantial array of reasoning behind your attitude (unless you're just...a twat). So this would only be a confirmation/contribution.
     

Share This Page